data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/364a9/364a93cc5e239f4c8016444a7b5f54ff01bc34a8" alt="Media player classic black edition"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e2a6/5e2a61a86700de858b14adcabca6a33e64b3c97b" alt="media player classic black edition media player classic black edition"
Also, MPC-HC is integrated graphics enforced, therefore is more troublesome than MPC-BE in terms of shipping a discrete graphic like MadVR. Since Media Player Classic Home Cinema cooperates with LAV filter, it is more efficient in decoding high-res video codecs like HEVC, H.2656/264, VP9/8, which, yet on the other hand results in the less effective support for HW decoding, in comparison with MPC-BE, due to DXVA1.0 incompatibility. The only difference that matters between the two players is the use of LAV Filters. The latest version of MPC-BE is V1.4.6, and the newest version of MPC-HC has already come to 1.7.10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf5a3/cf5a398970a99c3a89c338259cd8ec396a6d9afb" alt="media player classic black edition media player classic black edition"
However, MPC-BE is not as frequently updated as MPC-HC. Both the players support many languages and almost all media files. Some prefer MPC-HC's LAV filters for decoding while others prefer MPC-BE's preview pane on the navigation bar like what YouTube is doing. Generally, from users' perspective, there aren't many big differences between the two players.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/364a9/364a93cc5e239f4c8016444a7b5f54ff01bc34a8" alt="Media player classic black edition"